All Blog Posts
Evidence Matters | Student Behavior, Classroom Discipline, and Teacher Authority: Finding the Balance Schools Need
When classroom disruptions become the norm, who pays the price? A teacher trying to deliver a lesson, a student struggling to stay focused, and classmates hoping to learn all share the consequences when behavior challenges take over instructional time.
Across the country, questions about student behavior, classroom discipline, and teacher authority are raising difficult questions for schools, families, and policymakers: How can schools maintain order without sacrificing fairness? How can teachers enforce expectations while building trusting relationships with students? And what happens when educators feel they lack the support or authority to manage their classrooms effectively?
A Growing Challenge for Teachers
Recent research underscores the strain that student behavior can place on educators. According to RAND Corporation’s 2026 reporting on public education, managing student behavior was the leading source of job-related stress among 52% of surveyed teachers. When teachers spend substantial instructional time addressing disruptions, students lose learning opportunities and educators face additional professional stress. These pressures also raise concerns about teacher retention and the long-term stability of the educator workforce.
Balancing classroom discipline is one of the most complex challenges educators face. Teachers must maintain order, protect instructional time, and ensure that all students have the opportunity to learn, while also recognizing that students bring different developmental needs, personal experiences, and behavioral challenges into the classroom. Discipline that is too lenient or inconsistently enforced can undermine teacher authority, disrupt learning, and leave students uncertain about expectations. Conversely, overly punitive approaches can damage relationships, disproportionately affect certain student groups, and remove students from valuable instructional time.
Finding the right balance requires more than choosing between strict rules and supportive relationships; it requires establishing clear expectations, applying consequences fairly and consistently, and responding to misbehavior in ways that promote accountability and growth.
Discipline, Fairness, and Student Opportunity
But the discipline that occurs within the four walls of a specific classroom is only one piece of the puzzle. How teachers, administrators, and schools enforce discipline more broadly matters just as much. The U.S. Department of Education’s Civil Rights Data Collection provides national data on disciplinary practices and documents disparities. As of 2024, Black males accounted for 7% of K-12 student enrollment, while accounting for 22% of students who received one or more out-of-school suspensions and 22% of students who were expelled. When looking at students identified as having one or more disabilities, students served under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) represented 15% of K-12 student enrollment but accounted for 27% of students who received out-of-school suspensions. These patterns warrant careful examination of school policies, disciplinary decisions, and how rules are applied.
Importantly, while suspension and exclusion may sometimes be necessary to protect school safety, they also remove students from instruction. Research on school discipline has raised concerns about the relationship between exclusionary practices and adverse educational outcomes, reinforcing the importance of teachers and schools being equipped with the ability to consider alternatives where appropriate.
Moving From Conflict to Policy Solutions
Improving classroom behavior requires more than asking teachers to be stricter or students to behave better. School leaders can establish schoolwide expectations, provide practical classroom-management training, ensure consistent administrative responses, and engage families before problems escalate. Policymakers can support these efforts through investments in counselors, behavioral specialists, professional development, and reliable discipline data.
Accountability must also extend to the system. Schools should examine whether disciplinary practices improve safety and learning, whether teachers receive timely support, and whether particular groups of students are disproportionately excluded from instruction.
Ultimately, strong classroom discipline and equitable education are not competing goals. Students deserve safe, orderly classrooms, and teachers deserve the authority and support necessary to lead them. The policy challenge is to build systems that uphold both: classrooms with clear boundaries, fair consequences, meaningful relationships, and a shared commitment to learning.
Kelly Gregory is the Riley Institute’s Director for Public Education Partnerships and Projects and previously taught for 11 years in South Carolina public schools. She holds a bachelor’s degree in Psychology and a master’s degree in Special Education. She also holds a National Board certification as an Exceptional Needs Specialist. She can be reached at [email protected].