|
Nuts and Bolts
Staff Advisory Committee Nuts and Bolts Questions
The following questions and answers should help define how the Staff Advisory
Committee goes about its business. I asked the questions and Susan Zeiger provided
answers.
Whom do we advise?
The primary group that will receive your input will be the Administrative or
President's Council, depending on the subject and the impact of the recommendation.
At times, this could be just one director or VP, at other times, it could
be the whole group.
What are the powers of the committee? Is it to be a voice for the staff? If
so who will listen to that voice? Who will answer?
The powers are advisory. You are supposed to be a voice for staff and represent
your respective areas. The primary purpose is to improve communication with
the administration. The idea was to get staff issues on the table and addressed
in an on-going manner, rather than waiting for a staff survey every 3 or so
years. I have been asked to be the liaison between the staff advisory group
and the administration. It would be my responsibility to get the right people
together and to help facilitate the process of getting a response or resolution
to the issues raised. This is the role I played with the issues raised by the
staff survey.
If there is an issue that the committee considers important and should
be pursued then what can we do Does the StaffAC, or a representative,
meet with someone in the administration?
Again, I would be your liaison. Let's say you have an issue with mail services.
My job will be to get background information, if available to the StaffAC and
then, get the StaffAC or its selected subset together with the appropriate
decision-makers in mail services. (By either inviting them to the meeting or
helping set up a meeting between the two parties) I would reinforce the fact
that the StaffAC is representing staff and that it is in the best interest
of the department to address the issues raised. I would also be the one that
StaffAC comes to if they have concerns about getting a response from a
department. I would also advise the StaffAC if there are any cautions or if
there may be an alternative approach that would be more successful.
How do we communicate with the people we're representing? Some
ways could be: a) word of mouth, b) email, c) Inside Furman, d) web page on
the www.furman.edu site.
Depending on the department, you may need to use all of these in some way.
I can see word of mouth, paper and e-mail as tools for gathering input from
colleagues about issues. I can see e-mail, web site and Inside Furman as ways
to let everyone know about your issues and the outcomes---to reinforce the
fact that the committee is working and has an impact.
| StaffAC Home | Organization | Nuts & Bolts | Staff
Open Forum |Feedback | FAQ | |